Technology

Is gentrification the new manifest destiny?

Manifest Destiny, what is it? Manifest Destiny was the belief of 19th century colonists that US expansion across the American continents was both justified and inevitable. The colonists believed it was God’s ordained wish that all of North America, from ocean to ocean, including Mexico and Canada, would soon belong to them. This was used as justification for US domestic policy toward the natives as they moved west. It was used as a justification to violently seize control of California and Texas from Mexico. It was also used as justification for invading and attacking Canada after 1812, something many Americans were never taught about. It would seem a bit harsh to compare this to gentrification.

Many see gentrification as the revitalization of poor inner-city areas into prosperous, middle-class urban communities. However, when examined through a closer lens, it can be seen that gentrification and revitalization are not quite the same thing. Gentrification has a price. Gentrification is the process in which high-income investors buy up low-income urban neighborhoods in an attempt to capitalize on low property values. This process results in inflation of property values ​​that displaces low-income residents who in their entirety can no longer afford to live there. It also displaces the culture and character that bound the community together. Displacing people and erasing the culture of entire communities is the price of gentrification.

It would be a mistake to view gentrification as a racial issue. Those who cite gentrification as the reversal of the “white flight” of the 20th century do not have a full understanding of the problem. However, due to the fact that gentrifying low-income urban neighborhoods are often filled with black and/or Hispanic residents and replaced by white, middle-class residents, race looms large in the issue. The elimination of race is the result of gentrification, but not the cause or reason for its initiation. Racism is not a heavy factor when it comes to the issue. Black people often oppose gentrification because their neighborhoods and cultures are being erased and scattered through it. Neighborhoods like Harlem, Washington DC, Brooklyn, and Atlanta are losing their black population as we speak. As well as many other cities in the interior.

I am an Atlanta native myself and can remember around 2008 when the city forced thousands of Black families to move without providing them with an alternative low-income housing option. They were just kicked out and told to find another place to live. Housing projects like Bowen Homes, Bankhead Courts, etc. they were emptied and razed to the ground. His plan was to turn the Atlanta ghetto, Bankhead (a long road on which these housing projects were located), into a middle-class neighborhood in the near future. The city even changed the street name from Bankhead Hwy to Donald Lee Hollowell Pkwy to make it unrecognizable to those who knew it as home. Instead of building poor communities for the less fortunate who live there, public and private investors are building neighborhoods and forcing the poor who live there to find another home somewhere far away.

How does this change the culture of Atlanta? Simple, Atlanta for the past 20 years has been known as America’s “black mecca,” just as Harlem was known during the Harlem Cultural Renaissance. Atlanta has also been known as the international headquarters for this new music called Rap and Hip Hop, as has Harlem with Jazz during the Harlem Renaissance. With current gentrification trends, it’s sad to say that this won’t be the case 10 years from now. Atlanta’s black population in 2000 was 61.4% and dropped to 54.0% in 2010 and is still falling. In 2009, Atlanta fell 714 votes short of electing its first non-black mayor since 1974. Downtown Atlanta neighborhoods are being gentrified, like East Atlanta and the Old Fourth Ward, ghettos being replaced by luxury homes. Whites are moving into these luxury homes and this is causing a movement of blacks into rural towns and adjacent suburbs. Atlanta’s black hip hop culture will be unrecognizable, perhaps even non-existent in the near future.

What is even more devastating than losing a culture is the disinvestment that will soon follow as a result of gentrification. We can take a quick look at history and it will give us an idea of ​​our near and far future to come. In the mid-20th century, blacks began to move away from the South and into the inner cities in search of jobs and better opportunities in the American dream. This was the cause of the “white flight”, which was a migration of whites out of racially mixed urban areas. As a result, divestment from racially mixed inner-city communities began. This was the time, as Spike Lee says, where garbage was not picked up every day and the police were not making sure communities were protected. Now, through gentrification, these neighborhoods are being reinvested and they’re protected and they have daily garbage collection, but the poor don’t live there anymore. The poor are now homeless or are being relocated to the suburbs and back south. As a result of such a focus on inner-city communities, disinvestment is being disinvested in suburban and rural areas and this will be the trend for decades to come. The suburbs will now become ghettos with high crime rates and poor schools that receive no investment from the public or private sectors. The same mistreatment of the poor simply continues in a new location. It is important to understand this. Gentrification isn’t doing the inner-city low-income families it claims to be helping any good.

What about the few households that don’t rent, the urban landlords? Doesn’t increasing property value benefit them? Before investors can redevelop a neighborhood, there must be a plan laid out years in advance. These years prior to the matter are typically the time investors spend purchasing the property in the planned area. Most of the native properties in the area are purchased before gentrification begins. The last stubborn minority are those who are aware of the property value increase to come. What also comes with higher property values, however, is higher prices on everything else. Gas, clothing, groceries, property tax, bills, and even a daily lunch become more expensive while income stays the same. They find themselves in a situation where they can no longer afford to live in the area and the property is sold before the full potential for property value growth is realized. Even the minority of inner-city homeowners are not benefiting from gentrification.

What does all this mean and how does it relate to manifest destiny? As I said before, gentrification is not a racial problem, although it may seem that way to many in the United States. It is more a problem of western ideology. Gentrification is occurring throughout Western civilization. San Francisco, East London, Berlin, Soho, Barcelona, ​​Rio, Portland are just a few other cities to name. Many call this problem a “Columbus syndrome” effect. When you supposedly discover something that the natives there already knew, you have Columbus syndrome. The symptoms of Colon syndrome are infiltrating the land the natives live on because you care, forcing them out, making it your new home, taking things from their culture and calling it your own. If you experience any of these symptoms, call your doctor. In all seriousness, it sounds a lot like what happened to the natives of our country. At the same time, it looks a lot like what happens through gentrification. Manifest destiny was the violent and consistently evil removal of the inhabitants of the newly discovered land. Gentrification is the incoherent economic removal of people from reinvested land. In this way, the two are not compared, but the similarities are striking. I leave you with this question. Do the benefits of gentrification outweigh the consequences? If not, let’s fight to regulate the gentrification process.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *