Business

Hypocrisy of overregulation

Legislators and regulators often create rules and regulations using a linear mindset. They claim they understand the issues, they even have public hearings to prove it. However, the people who can attend such events are often lawyers and losers. Losers because anyone in the market who was winning has no time to introduce themselves, they are too busy producing and participating in their respective industries. So they hire lawyers to come forward and talk to the regulators. Those attorneys who don’t have actual clients of any value also show up because they know that if they’re getting into bed with regulators and leaning a bit, they can get an occasional scoop in the process and a little juice. This can help them get good corporate clients and earn a lot of money. All these scoundrels, I mean that lawyers have to do is promise jobs to regulators when they get tired of the red tape.

I realize that this is not news to anyone. But we are making many mistakes in our rush to regulate business, as they destroy free enterprise. Take the most recent legislation proposed by the FTC, the Federal Trade Commission for franchise rule. Too often we are creating rules that are out of place with the changing and evolving business model of franchises and awaiting complaints from renegade and non-compliant franchisees on the FTC online complaint form. He graciously pointed out in his franchise report recently.

Filing cases, with manipulated statements made by people persuaded to embellish complaints due to promised monetary settlements, isn’t it law enforcement? That is criminal, it is called lying, it should not be considered police, it is more like the mafia, where they shoot down those who oppose them and then use them as an example. Shouldn’t we have an internal investigation into these manipulations and what I call fraud within the Federal Trade Commission? Targeting a potential case and then notifying about 70 different agencies in various jurisdictions in the US, Canada, and abroad and putting a business on a “watch list” is not law enforcement, it is harassment. Calling, emailing, and contacting a business or individuals based on competitors’ complaints to catch them is not law enforcement. I think Adam Smith could have a better definition than me, maybe even Karl Marx would like to have an opinion.

Filing cases in secret court and freezing the assets of an ongoing business to starve a business and win a serious case is not law enforcement, it is a malicious abuse of power. I can prove that all of this is happening. None of whom I would consider Law Enforcement Experience. This must end now. These are the unintended consequences of unnecessary regulations and abuse of power where corruption is guaranteed by the absolute power of owning a box the industry has been put in by regulators who have never had to write a paycheck or legislators. they got theirs lying through those smiling whites. teeth covered under a fancy wig.

Why do we let the government do that? And why let the small departments of the big bureaucracies stifle free enterprise and pretend that they are doing more than helping their future employers while the revolving door swings and turns? Is the only true evil in our world today the fleeing bureaucracy? Think about this, I will contact you.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *